Jonathan Taylor

Jonathan Taylor is the seventh pick in fantasy drafts right now. And his eighteen rushing touchdowns — the most in football last year — are exactly why that price is wrong. They're also exactly why somebody in your league will happily pay it. This is the Muffed 2026 preview: what he did, what repeats, and what you should actually pay for.

Start with the season he had, because it was magnificent. Twenty-one point three PPR points a game — the number four running back in football, per game AND in total, and that symmetry matters: no padded ranking, no soft stretch. Three hundred twenty-three carries — the most in the NFL — for fifteen eighty-five at four-nine a pop. Eighteen rushing scores. Forty-six catches on top. Seventeen games, zero missed. And the efficiency held under all that weight: plus one hundred ninety-five rushing yards over expected, fifth-most in football. The defining day was Week 10 against Atlanta — thirty-two carries, two hundred forty-four yards, three scores, including an eighty-three-yard touchdown with the game on the line. A forty-nine point fantasy eruption. That's the full resume: volume, efficiency, touchdowns, health.

Now zoom out, because here's where it gets interesting. This is year six for Taylor. And we have seen this exact season from him before — almost line for line. Twenty twenty-one: twenty-two points a game, RB2, eighteen rushing touchdowns, a third of his fantasy value from scores. Twenty twenty-five: twenty-one point three, RB4, eighteen rushing touchdowns, a third of his value from scores. He is the only back this decade with two eighteen-rushing-touchdown seasons. Nobody else has even done it twice. And what followed the first one? Thirteen point three a game. RB17. Now — honesty, because that's the house style: twenty twenty-two was also an ankle injury and a quarterback carousel. The collapse wasn't pure touchdown regression. But the climb back tells you what his non-touchdown baseline looks like: fifteen and a half, seventeen and a half, and then last year, when the scores came home again, twenty-one. The touchdowns are the tide in this career.

So let's decompose what actually repeats. Ten years of data, every back in football. Carries repeat — volume is identity, and three hundred twenty-three carries with no competition for the role is as safe as workload gets. The receiving game repeats and his is growing — forty-six catches was a career high, up from the upper-thirties in his best years. That's the part of this profile quietly getting better. But touchdown share? Touchdown share is weather. Taylor's thirty-three percent — a third of his points from trips to the paint — puts him in the top quartile of touchdown-dependent backs, and that group, across a decade, falls off by three points a game the following season. Not sometimes — on average, and it holds in both halves of the decade. Take twenty-one point three, subtract three, and you're at eighteen and change: sixth-best-back production. Excellent. Just not what pick seven is paying for.

The situation, briefly — and this part the data can't model, so we'll just say what's known. Indianapolis re-signed Daniel Jones this offseason on a two-year deal, per reports in March — but he's coming back from a late-season Achilles, throwing at OTAs by the June reports. And Taylor himself is in contract talks, saying all the right things about being a Colt for life. How it cuts: a healthy Jones means the same top-ten rushing environment that produced all those goal-line trips. A slow Achilles recovery means loaded boxes and a touchdown environment that sags. You're not just drafting Taylor's legs — you're drafting that tendon.

So, the price. Pick seven and a half, the fourth back off the board, as of our June tenth snapshot. That price pays for a top-four repeat — for the eighteen touchdowns coming home again. Our verdict, and it's a real call: overpriced. Not a fade — a price correction. The honest counter-argument, out loud: the workload is bulletproof, the receiving role is growing, and if anyone's built to outrun a base rate it's a twenty-seven-year-old bell cow with no backup in sight. The role is real. The touchdowns are rented. Pay for the role.

What to watch once September comes: his share of the carries inside the five — that's where eighteen touchdowns either reload or don't. The catches — if forty-six becomes fifty-five, the floor rises and this call weakens. And Daniel Jones's legs, literally. If Taylor's one of your guys, this is what Muffed does every single week of the season — your roster, the real numbers, no theater. Your next preview is already queued.